The situation is structural, not cyclical
For several years, food industry SME leaders have lived the same impossible equation: costs are rising across every line, and selling prices can no longer follow.
This is not an impression. In 2024, according to the barometer from ANIA (the French national association of food industries), 64% of businesses in the sector saw their production costs rise across all their expense lines. Energy, payroll, transport, industrial raw materials: everything is going up. Against that, food inflation has died out. Retailers no longer pass increases on, and consumers have exhausted their tolerance for price rises.
The result: 46% of food manufacturers expect their margins to fall.
That figure is worth pausing on. This is not a struggling minority — it is almost half of a sector representing 212 billion euros in revenue, 98% of whose businesses are SMEs. And the trend is not new: between 2007 and 2020, the sector's margin rate lost 16 points, roughly 40% of its profitability in 14 years.
Yet in most food industry SMEs, margins are still managed globally, with a monthly or quarterly look at aggregate indicators. That is exactly where the problem hides.
The scissor effect: understanding what is really happening
The term "scissor effect" describes the convergence of two opposing movements that squeeze the margin: costs going up, and selling prices hitting a ceiling.
Costs are rising on every front
Over one year, the sector recorded significant increases on each expense line:
| Expense line | Annual increase (2024) |
|---|---|
| Energy | +2.4% |
| Payroll | +4.3% |
| Transport | +4.3% |
| Industrial raw materials | +3.7% |
*Source: ANIA, Food industries barometer, December 2024.*
These increases compound. An SME working on net margins of 4 to 6% — which is common in the food industry — sees those margin points disappear quickly when its costs rise 3 to 4% on every line.
Selling prices no longer compensate
For two years, manufacturers were able to pass part of their cost increases into prices. That cycle is over. Food inflation stopped in 2024. Retailers have taken back the upper hand in commercial negotiations, and consumers, whose purchasing power remains under pressure, resist any new price rise.
SMEs therefore find themselves in a structurally difficult position: unable to raise selling prices, unable to compress costs further without touching quality, and with limited negotiating power against a concentrated retail sector.
What global figures do not tell you
The most frequent mistake in managing a food industry SME's margins is not poor cost control. It is thinking too globally.
A gross margin rate of 28% across your whole business can mask highly contrasted situations. Some products have a 40% margin, others 8%. Some customers buy large volumes of low-margin references from you. Some orders generate logistics costs that wipe out the commercial margin.
Take the example of Thomas, who runs a meat processing SME with six million euros in revenue. His monthly dashboard shows a gross margin of 24%, in line with his sector average. But when his team finally cross-referenced sales data with production costs by reference, the picture was more nuanced: three references represented 35% of revenue but only 12% of the margin. One customer, among his five largest buyers, ordered exclusively those references.
This is not an exceptional situation. It is a common one that global figures render invisible.
INSEE confirms it at sector level: in 2022, the margin rate ranged from 19.4% in industrial bakery to 43.9% in vegetable oils and fats manufacturing. Within your own business, the gaps are probably just as significant.
The three most frequent mistakes
Selling more to compensate
That is the first reflex. If the margin falls, new volumes must be found. Sometimes it is the right decision — but rarely the first one to take. Increasing revenue on unprofitable references or customers only amplifies the problem. Before trying to sell more, you need to know where you actually make money.
Cutting costs without identifying them
Cost reduction is necessary, but it must be targeted. Squeezing raw materials by accepting lower quality is a product risk and a commercial risk. The real cost-reduction levers are elsewhere: material losses, overdosing, logistics inefficiencies, non-conformities that generate rework. These forms of waste are rarely measured precisely.
Waiting for month-end figures
In a context of volatile costs, a month is too long. If a raw material increase occurs in week 1, you will only see it in your figures in week 5 or 6 — after already producing, selling, and perhaps delivering at a fixed price. Responsiveness has become a competitive advantage in its own right.
How to take back control: four concrete levers
Key takeaway
managing your margins is not looking at a global figure once a month. It is knowing, at all times, which products, which customers and which channels genuinely contribute to your profitability — and which destroy it.
1. Calculate the real margin by product
Not the accounting gross margin. The contribution margin, which includes the direct variable costs of each reference: raw materials at actual purchase cost, packaging, production time, specific logistics. That granularity lets you immediately identify which references deserve commercial defence and which require either a price renegotiation or a reformulation.
2. Identify profitable customers versus value-destroying ones
Not all customers are equal in terms of contribution to margin. A customer representing 20% of your revenue but ordering exclusively small, low-margin references, with complex logistics and long payment terms, may perfectly well generate a negative contribution once all costs are taken into account.
Knowing the net margin per customer — not just the revenue they generate — radically changes commercial priorities.
3. Simulate the impact of a raw material rise before acting
When the wheat price rises 10%, which products in your range see their margin fall below the acceptable threshold? Which customers can accept a price increase, and which risk leaving? What increase is needed to maintain your target profitability?
Done manually in Excel, these simulations take time and are often approximate. Done with the right data and the right tools, they let you prepare a commercial negotiation with precise arguments rather than an intuition.
4. Set up alerts on margin thresholds
Rather than waiting for the monthly accounts, define thresholds. If the margin of a product family falls below X%, you are alerted immediately. If the purchase cost of a raw material exceeds a certain level, you know in real time the impact on your profitability. That is exactly what tools like Agrolytics make possible: turning data that was sleeping in your ERP or your spreadsheets into operational alert signals.
The five indicators to track every week
| Indicator | What it reveals |
|---|---|
| Contribution margin by reference | Which products make or lose money |
| Net margin by customer | Which customers really contribute to profitability |
| Monthly change in raw material cost | The signals before the impact is visible in the accounts |
| Material loss rate by production line | The often invisible pool of cost reduction |
| Gap between actual and theoretical selling price | The commercial discounts silently eroding margins |
These five indicators do not require a dedicated finance team. They require your data — the data that already exists in your ERP or your production files — to be organised so as to produce them automatically.
What it changes concretely
Back to Thomas: once his analysis by reference and by customer was done, he took three decisions in less than two weeks. He renegotiated prices on two references with his problem customer. He discontinued a reference that consumed production resources without contributing to margin. And he commercially prioritised two high-margin customers who ordered little but regularly.
The result six months later: revenue fell slightly. Gross margin rose by 3 points.
That is exactly the demonstration that it is often more useful to sell better than to sell more.
Going further
Margins are the most symptomatic indicator of a food industry SME's health — but they are never explained on their own. A margin drop is almost always the combination of a commercial problem (the good customers are no longer ordering enough), a purchasing problem (a raw material rise passed on badly), and a management problem (the data did not surface in time to act).
That is why data-driven management, connecting these three dimensions in real time, has become a competitive advantage in a sector where the margin for error has become very thin.
Want to see what your margins are really hiding? Book an Agrolytics demo — in 30 minutes, we show you what your data already says about your profitability.
Ready to take control of your data?
Book a 30-minute demo and see what Agrolytics can do for you.
Book a demo
